🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban remains "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to approve a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," said one MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this global debate evolves, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.