🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing rebellion from MPs following government officials abandoned plans to give workers immediate safeguards against unfair dismissal, a U-turn that breaches the campaign commitments.

MPs Voice Concerns

MPs including a former minister who spearheaded the employment rights bill expressed apprehension regarding the retreat announced by the government.

Ministers have axed the proposal to scrap the 24-month eligibility timeframe for workers to submit unfair firing complaints and enable them to proceed starting immediately in a new job, to try to get the proposed law through government.

Government Impasse

The legislation became trapped in a confrontation among upper and lower chambers concerning the first draft to provide employee safeguards on day one, along with provisions to ban "exploitative" zero-hours contracts.

The administration now aims to establish the protection over unfair dismissal post six-month work period rather, although additional first-day entitlements to fatherhood time off and illness compensation remain scheduled to proceed, becoming active in April 2026.

Backlash and Criticism

The Labour MP for the Teesside area characterized the decision as a "total abandonment" and committed to campaign for its overturning.

"We are unable to endorse that partial approach."

"This is a wrong-headed move and I will campaign to overturn this compromise."

Another Labour MP expressed frustration regarding insufficient discussion, observing: "There has been no discussion with party members. The Lords don't have primacy over a manifesto commitment, hence what prompted our让步?"

Wider Consequences

A third Labour MP commented: "Companies need not concern themselves from day-one rights, while employees have much to lose from an employer who resists first-day entitlements."

The ex-labor secretary asserted that the decision "undoubtedly constitutes a pledge violation."

Ministerial Explanation

The schools minister explained there was a "very real prospect" the enactment of the employment rights bill would have been delayed if the government had not made a U-turn over first-day rights against wrongful termination.

"There has been discussion on the point around unfair dismissal and the duration requirement with employers, trade unions and ministers, and following that discussion understanding has been reached about the way forward, that represents positive development."

The secretary highlighted that "This indicates the qualifying period will reduce from 730 days to 180 days, and this occurs simultaneously with crucial immediate protections concerning illness compensation and around parental leave."

"But the risk here was without forward movement, those significant entitlements might not be implemented beginning second quarter 2026."

Following inquiry concerning if it constituted a broken promise, the secretary answered: "Within the election platform, our commitment stated was that we would work with worker representatives, with business, with community groups, through dialogue regarding those protections we intended to implement."

"Therefore, two components exist concerning that issue, in the election platform, the significant entitlements and the discussion process."